Posting has resumed on Norman Bonney's regular website on community councils with an item on the valuable role that community councils play in the current weather emergency
Visit http://www.normanbonneyoncommunitycouncils.blogspot.com/
Wednesday 8 December 2010
Saturday 4 December 2010
What the 'vote No for the single candidate for national president' campaign achieved
The campaign to 'vote NO for the single candidate for national president' campaign has raised the level of performance of ASCC by producing the first keenly contested election to national officer positions in the history of the association. It could well be the start of a normal expectation that there will, in the future, be regular contests for such posts in the annual ballot.
The fact that 18 community councils voted against the single official candidate for national president demonstrates, too, that there is substantial dissatisfaction among a significant number of community councils with the procedures and policies of ASCC and belies the claim that this dissatisfaction is simply the work of a few malcontents with personal agendas. There are concrete issues that need attention.
The more vibrant the democratic process in ASCC the more responsive it will be to its membership. The campaign to vote NO has done a service to ASCC members.
.
The fact that 18 community councils voted against the single official candidate for national president demonstrates, too, that there is substantial dissatisfaction among a significant number of community councils with the procedures and policies of ASCC and belies the claim that this dissatisfaction is simply the work of a few malcontents with personal agendas. There are concrete issues that need attention.
The more vibrant the democratic process in ASCC the more responsive it will be to its membership. The campaign to vote NO has done a service to ASCC members.
.
Monday 29 November 2010
Another annual meeting
At the weekend I attended the annual meeting of a national UK membership association.
Candidates for national office and for the national committee presented their case to an audience of 150 or so members and were subject to questioning. The votes of those present determined the outcome of the elections. There was vigorous debate over a motion and all present left, I sensed, feeling that they had had an opportunity to participate and influence the organisation for another year.
Might not this be a better model for ASCC than postal balloting which does not appear to produce a higher turnout and which lacks the vital sense of face to face discussion and debate that is so central to the democratic process?
Candidates for national office and for the national committee presented their case to an audience of 150 or so members and were subject to questioning. The votes of those present determined the outcome of the elections. There was vigorous debate over a motion and all present left, I sensed, feeling that they had had an opportunity to participate and influence the organisation for another year.
Might not this be a better model for ASCC than postal balloting which does not appear to produce a higher turnout and which lacks the vital sense of face to face discussion and debate that is so central to the democratic process?
Saturday 27 November 2010
Results of ASCC postal ballot
ASCC annual postal ballot results are now on the webpage of ASCC at http://www.ascc.org.uk/
Thursday 25 November 2010
Timeline to Exclusion
How Edinburgh and the Lothians came to be excluded from full involvement in the deliberations of the Executive Council/Board of ASCC
December 2009
Resignation of the previous elected area representative from Edinburgh
March 2010
Regional meeting for Edinburgh and Lothians should be held (two years since the previous one)
April 2010
Election of ASCC area representatives for Edinburgh, West Lothian and Midlothian. Midlothian representative re-elected. No nominations for East Lothians.
A continuing vacancy on the Board/Executive throughout the year for one of the two positions for Edinburgh and Lothians. The other position continually occupied through extension of the expiring two year term of the representative from Midlothian.
14 August 2010
Edinburgh and Lothians regional meeting finally held in Livingston at which both positions on the Board/Executive for the region should have been decided among the three area representatives in post. None of the three area representatives able to be present.
15 August 2010 - 1 October 2010
7 week period in which the Executive Council/Board could organise an election among the three in post area representatives for the two positions on the Board for Edinburgh and the Lothians. This period also included a meeting of Board/Executive/area representatives on 25 September 2010 when the election could have been held.
October 2010
Executive Council/Board with an unfilled place for Edinburgh and Lothians makes nominations of single candidates for election to national officer positions.
19/20 November 2010.
Slate of single candidates for national officer positions declared elected. No results published as of 25 November but they are there on 27 November 2010.
21 November 2010 onwards
A continuing vacancy on the Board for Edinburgh and Lothians
December 2009
Resignation of the previous elected area representative from Edinburgh
March 2010
Regional meeting for Edinburgh and Lothians should be held (two years since the previous one)
April 2010
Election of ASCC area representatives for Edinburgh, West Lothian and Midlothian. Midlothian representative re-elected. No nominations for East Lothians.
A continuing vacancy on the Board/Executive throughout the year for one of the two positions for Edinburgh and Lothians. The other position continually occupied through extension of the expiring two year term of the representative from Midlothian.
14 August 2010
Edinburgh and Lothians regional meeting finally held in Livingston at which both positions on the Board/Executive for the region should have been decided among the three area representatives in post. None of the three area representatives able to be present.
15 August 2010 - 1 October 2010
7 week period in which the Executive Council/Board could organise an election among the three in post area representatives for the two positions on the Board for Edinburgh and the Lothians. This period also included a meeting of Board/Executive/area representatives on 25 September 2010 when the election could have been held.
October 2010
Executive Council/Board with an unfilled place for Edinburgh and Lothians makes nominations of single candidates for election to national officer positions.
19/20 November 2010.
Slate of single candidates for national officer positions declared elected. No results published as of 25 November but they are there on 27 November 2010.
21 November 2010 onwards
A continuing vacancy on the Board for Edinburgh and Lothians
Sunday 21 November 2010
Mixed reviews again - this time for ASCC annual meeting
The annual ASCC conference in Glasgow Saturday 20 November 2010 was well attended with well over a hundred present.
The programme contributions were all good - but perhaps went on too long - thus reducing time for discussion of national ASCC matters.
There was a clear expressed need among the attending community councillors for the annual meeting to be more of the usual agm business meeting character with which people are familiar. There is a clear need for face to face discussion and debate about the organisation and policies of ASCC and there isn't enough time for that in this existing format.
Clearly a need here for further constitutional change.
It was surprising too, that having declared that all of the single candidates for national office elected, those acting as national officers were not able to give the figures for and against each candidate.
The programme contributions were all good - but perhaps went on too long - thus reducing time for discussion of national ASCC matters.
There was a clear expressed need among the attending community councillors for the annual meeting to be more of the usual agm business meeting character with which people are familiar. There is a clear need for face to face discussion and debate about the organisation and policies of ASCC and there isn't enough time for that in this existing format.
Clearly a need here for further constitutional change.
It was surprising too, that having declared that all of the single candidates for national office elected, those acting as national officers were not able to give the figures for and against each candidate.
Thursday 18 November 2010
Mixed review of ASCC after four years of the new constitution and leadership
A mixed review of ASCC is in order after four years of operation of the currrent constitution and the changed leadership.
There have been major improvements - a much better website with improved content which is a great resource for community councillors - a higher profile in policy making circles - the achievement of better levels of funding - an occasional improved newsletter - and regional meetings to meet the members.
However this is all jeopardised by a culture which does not tolerate opposition or views that are critical of the leadership and its performance and which seeks to expel or exclude those with contrary opinions. A clear example of this is the failure to ensure that the Edinburgh and Lothians region is properly represented on the Board/Executive while steps have been made to ensure that other regions are so represented when vacancies arise.
Too many community councils find their experience of the constitution disempowering. Too many shackles are put upon independent initiative. Vigorous debate on the policies of ASCC (an essential element of a democratic and membership organisation) is relegated to the end of the agenda of the annual meeting.
Above all, the failure of the Executive/Board to present members with a choice of candidates for national officer posts indicates that it just seeks endorsement rather than participation from its membership . Contested elections are an essential feature of democracy, especially in a large membership based organisation.
Failing a choice of candidates a substantial section of the membership has this year decided to vote NO against the single candidate for national president to express opposition to the disempowering nature of the constitution and the leadership of ASCC.
There have been major improvements - a much better website with improved content which is a great resource for community councillors - a higher profile in policy making circles - the achievement of better levels of funding - an occasional improved newsletter - and regional meetings to meet the members.
However this is all jeopardised by a culture which does not tolerate opposition or views that are critical of the leadership and its performance and which seeks to expel or exclude those with contrary opinions. A clear example of this is the failure to ensure that the Edinburgh and Lothians region is properly represented on the Board/Executive while steps have been made to ensure that other regions are so represented when vacancies arise.
Too many community councils find their experience of the constitution disempowering. Too many shackles are put upon independent initiative. Vigorous debate on the policies of ASCC (an essential element of a democratic and membership organisation) is relegated to the end of the agenda of the annual meeting.
Above all, the failure of the Executive/Board to present members with a choice of candidates for national officer posts indicates that it just seeks endorsement rather than participation from its membership . Contested elections are an essential feature of democracy, especially in a large membership based organisation.
Failing a choice of candidates a substantial section of the membership has this year decided to vote NO against the single candidate for national president to express opposition to the disempowering nature of the constitution and the leadership of ASCC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)